Issue 49499 - address function should support 5 parameters
Summary: address function should support 5 parameters
Status: CLOSED NOT_AN_OOO_ISSUE
Alias: None
Product: Calc
Classification: Application
Component: code (show other issues)
Version: 680m90
Hardware: All All
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: ooo
QA Contact: issues@sc
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on: 20857
Blocks:
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2005-05-19 11:31 UTC by muthusuba
Modified: 2013-08-07 15:12 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: ENHANCEMENT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---


Attachments
a patch. (4.83 KB, patch)
2005-05-19 11:36 UTC, muthusuba
no flags Details | Diff
Introduces a Simple test - if the 4th parameter is a string then the call will be in the old format else its in the new format (4.92 KB, patch)
2005-08-12 18:12 UTC, muthusuba
no flags Details | Diff

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description muthusuba 2005-05-19 11:31:14 UTC
address function should support 5 parameters. currently it supports only 4. To
have a complete compatibility with excel, we should support 5 parameters.
Comment 1 muthusuba 2005-05-19 11:36:57 UTC
Created attachment 26316 [details]
a patch.
Comment 2 frank 2005-06-13 13:46:43 UTC
Hi Eike,

please have a look at this and decide on how to proceed.

Targeted for OOoLater at the moment.

Frank
Comment 3 ooo 2005-06-14 13:43:45 UTC
Hi Muthu,

The proposed patch introduces a problem: it breaks already existing documents
that use 4 parameters with this function, where the 4th parameter is a sheet
name. A new optional parameter normally should be appended to the parameter list
instead. Otherwise, action must be taken to insert the corresponding default
argument during file read, and to remove it when the document is saved again to
be able to read it with an older release. Furthermore, the result of setting the
new parameter currently  wouldn't make much sense, as the R1C1 notation isn't
supported yet. Omitting the parameter during import of Excel documents at least
keeps most documents in a usable state, as long as the resulting string isn't
used in subsequent string operations like comparisons and such. The R1C1
notation should be supported first, which would be issue 20857 => setting
dependency.

Eike
Comment 4 muthusuba 2005-08-12 18:12:13 UTC
Created attachment 28708 [details]
Introduces a Simple test - if the 4th parameter is a string then the call will be in the old format else its in the new format
Comment 5 ooo 2005-12-15 12:45:38 UTC
Too simple, this is not sufficient. The parameter could also be a cell/range
reference or array type.
Comment 6 ooo 2006-04-06 12:36:11 UTC
Muthu,

Will there be any progress on this?

  Eike
Comment 7 muthusuba 2006-04-06 12:44:14 UTC
Eike,
  Sure, I am looking at this.

Muthu
Comment 8 jodygoldberg 2006-04-06 14:52:29 UTC
This is handled by the r1c1 work which replaces address with something simpler.
Comment 9 ooo 2006-04-06 16:18:40 UTC
I think we should close this issue then.
Comment 10 ooo 2006-04-06 16:19:29 UTC
Closing.